Lindsay Goldner: Schadenfreude in Social Media?

Last semester, I set out to write my senior thesis for American Studies.  I’d been inspired by a song from the Broadway musical Avenue Q, in which snarky puppets sang about the joys of schadenfreude, or “German for happiness at the misfortune of others.”  Avenue Q’s fuzzy characters honed in on everyday examples of schadenfreude, like “football players getting tackled...CEO’s getting shackled.”  When I heard this song, I came to realize that schadenfreude wasn’t just found in such mundane experiences as seeing someone miss the train, but that it was actually a far more widespread cultural phenomenon and a key component within the realm of social media.

 

...in Social Media?

As I researched schadenfreude, it became apparent that it had become a social media driving force, both for why people enjoy various forms of social media, but also in determining the eventual popularity of different Web 2.0 content.  Take, for instance, the infamous “Star Wars Kid,” a Youtube video that has garnered over seventeen million hits since it was first posted.  The humor in the video lies not in a clever plot or witty dialogue, but in the entertainment enjoyed by the viewer at the expense of the film’s subject (and his dignity).  The “Star Wars Kid” video is therefore a prime example of the public’s enjoyment of social media content, resulting directly from a schadenfreude-based emotional response.  What is important for content creators to notice, then, is that this film’s audience not only enjoyed it because of its schadenfreuden effects, but that the audience then took advantage of the participatory nature of social media itself to widely share the video and allow others to experience similar feelings of schadenfreude.  Ultimately, this combination of schadenfreude and highly participatory media led to the virality of the video, and its popularity skyrocketed.

 


While schadenfreude may appear to be inherently malicious--which I believe to be the reason for so little social discourse on the topic--it contains a range of complexities, similar to any other emotional response.  It has primarily been studied with regards to in-group/out-group relations, desire, and envy, but not at all with regards to our emotional responses to specific forms of social media.  This occurrence of schadenfreude is worthy of study, though, for it is a factor that can propel web content like “Star Wars Kid” or Texts From Last Night from relative obscurity into complete viral status.  

 

For marketers and content creators in the social media sphere, this is particularly important.  Content can be manipulated or produced in a way so as to elicit schadenfreude from social media consumers; it then has a greater chance of going viral as consumers experiencing schadenfreude strive to share that emotional response with others in the social media sphere.  Not only does this cut down on marketing costs, as consumers disseminate the content themselves, but it also provides a reprieve from the standard emotional responses elicited by traditional marketing methods.

How do I use it?

Schadenfreude itself may not be the most positive example of human nature, but its existence in the human emotional spectrum is undeniable.  As a result, those of us working in social media should examine instances of schadenfreude in our own content consumption and sharing experiences.  We can then look to use this untapped emotional response which, in combination with the highly participatory nature of social media, can organically create successful viral campaigns.  

 

 

So... how do we take advantage of schadenfreude without completely taking advantage of the misfortunes of others? It’s a fine line, but one that has relative flexibility, especially as marketers are just beginning to make use of this response.  Here’s an example: say that you, Company X, want to create a marketing campaign promoting your service over that of your competitors.  A good way to bring about a schadenfreude-based reaction from your audience might be to reference Nike’s campaign, “Just do it,” but in reference to the recent Tiger Woods scandal. Your campaign, aimed at steering customers away from competitor Company Y, might begin with something like this:

 

By using an altered version of Nike’s highly-recognizable slogan, in addition to their shamed spokesperson, this ad would elicit schadenfreude towards Tiger, who in this (albeit rough) example represents “Company Y.”  Causing your audience to feel schadenfreude towards Tiger Woods allows them to experience a form of happiness at his misfortune, an experience they can then share through various channels of social media and as a result organically drive your marketing campaign’s success.


Remember, it’s necessary to observe the difference here between attention-grabbing and offensive. While some might argue that with the power to reach such a wide audience comes a hefty dose of responsibility, I simply ask myself: what would Mom say?

 

 Lindsay Goldner graduated from UC Berkeley and is now a marketing and event-planning intern at Shoestring, LLC.  She is currently searching for a full-time job at a startup company in marketing and social media-related roles. You can find her blog here and connect with her on Twitter or on LinkedIn.

 

Login or register to tag items

Discussion

Prehistoric schadenfreude

I suspect that schadenfreude is a very primitive emotion, possibly even from before we were even human. You see Og get eaten by a leopard and how can you not think, "Good thing it wasn't me and my family."

I wonder if antelopes think something like that as they watch one of the herd being caught by a lioness.

Even if they don't (and I don't ascribe super-intelligence to your standard-issue antelope, just possibly a relief at not being caught or not having to run quite so far or so fast, at least for a little while) have such feelings and thought processes, what we still have here is a rather elemental emotion.

There but for the grace of God go I. It wasn't my time yet (it was someone else's). I was chosen (and others weren't). Bad things are happening to others (but not to me and mine). I am, therefore, superior.

Perhaps it's not such a long trip from thankfulness at having been spared to acceptance to religion to understanding of the surrounding world to, uh oh, personal prejudice.

I think the social media practitioner would do well to proceed with caution. It is easy -- and there is quite a market out there -- to laugh or sit back and knowingly observe (and feel good about yourself) at others' expense. But when the tables are turned, it is not so nice. Companies do not stay on top forever. Someone inevitably screws up, or the market isn't read properly, or something revolutionary comes out of left field. There is a huge potential for this to boomerang back on anyone practicing it.

Caution, signs read: trouble ahead. It should be a yellow light, not a green one.

Wish you had a summary

I wanted to read this as Jason indicated he liked it, but it's just (a) too long and (b) does not have a good "summary" paragraph at the start.  I'll just need to remain ignorant on the subject of schadenfreude.  Sorry! 

Des Pieri